加入收藏】【设为首页】【繁体中文
当前位置:新闻首页 >> 槟城观点 >> Wi-Fi的争议!(英文版)

Wi-Fi的争议!(英文版)

2008-10-04 11:22:48  作者:Kah Seng  来源:http://sloone.wordpress.com  浏览次数:22  文字大小:【】【】【
简介:Although I support the WiFi plan after weighing the evidence and logic on health effect, let us not disparage the protesters. We need to listen to them too. Some WiFi supporters don’t understan ...

Although I support the WiFi plan after weighing the evidence and logic on health effect, let us not disparage the protesters. We need to listen to them too.

Some WiFi supporters don’t understand these opposite views:

* The protesters are concerned about the 24-hour nature of WiFi, compared with cellular phone which is placed near the ears for only minutes. (True, cellular towers are on all the time, precisely why these protesters are also against cellular towers).

* WiFi will give out RF that is unescapable, EVEN, EVERYWHERE in Penang, unlike cellular phone and towers, which have certain high-concentration areas only.

* Technology is a subset of science, and science is only a subset of truth. Scientific testing of hypothesis is testing that “WiFi is associated with bodily injury” but does not “prove” that WiFi cannot hurt the body. Science is sure exactly because it is also ultra-conservative and narrow in nature. Scientific testing also does not prove causal-effects.

Not finding evidence so far could be due to the short-term nature of the WiFi technology. Even cellular RF is only widespread over 10 years. Such obvious risk factors as drinking and smoking can take 40 years to “cause” cancer, and only among a small group of people affected by certain disease, like previous liver infection.

So we science and techno lovers can never afford to be arrogant, considering the narrow and conservative nature of science.

I dislike CAP’s protectionist, parochial, condescending, views, such as these:

Disneyland will decimate local culture
http://www.malaysiakini.com/letters/51925

Mcdonalds must apologise to Chinese
http://www.malaysiakini.com/letters/62533

Don’t let rice boil over into FTA
http://www.malaysiakini.com/letters/68618

But CAP did raise alarm on Sarawak and TM, such as these:

S’wak development plans require re-study
http://www.malaysiakini.com/letters/77943

No, not another two dams in Sarawak
http://www.malaysiakini.com/letters/73450

Bakun water catchment area - another promise broken
http://www.malaysiakini.com/letters/73266

TM subscribers ripped off by voice-mail service
http://www.malaysiakini.com/letters/57323

I think more than half of CAP view is worthy. That’s more than you can say for many of our politicians and regulators.

责任编辑:admin


相关文章
 

最新文章

更多

· 冠英:槟新政府不打算追...
· 冠英:马银行花82亿收购...
· 冠英:交棒前恢复中央各...
· 土地转换:槟政府犯错?...
· 冠英:打造槟城成国际城市
· 槟城无线:公开谘询!(英...
· 之前海啸,现遭火劫!(英...
· 槟政府:若有证据显示有...
· Wi-Fi的争议!(英文版)
· 槟消协针对Wi-Fi立场!(...

推荐文章

更多

· 冠英:槟新政府不打算追...
· 冠英:马银行花82亿收购...
· 冠英:交棒前恢复中央各...
· 土地转换:槟政府犯错?...
· 冠英:打造槟城成国际城市
· 槟城无线:公开谘询!(英...
· 之前海啸,现遭火劫!(英...
· 槟政府:若有证据显示有...
· Wi-Fi的争议!(英文版)
· 槟消协针对Wi-Fi立场!(...

热点文章

更多

· 冠英:槟新政府不打算追...
· Why not do away with e...
· ‘Kings of Tennis’ to...